This video was removed from Google Video on February 13,
2007 without explanation.
YouTube blocked my attempt to publish it this morning (February
Before it was removed, this page received 19,802 visits in four
I have read Google's terms of service and in no way does this
video violate any of them.
I am the creator of this video and its copyright owner. The
video's content is not illegal, obscene, an invasion of anyone's
privacy, an incitement to hate or a graphic potrayal of violence.
He's an explanation of what Google is preventing you from
Two major 9/11 anomalies have been thoroughly
1) The stand down of US air defense
on the morning of 9/11 that permitted commercial jet aircraft to fly
erratically and in restricted air space without challenge
Overwhelming physical evidence that World Trade Center buildings #1,
#2, and #7 were brought down by controlled demolition
significant anomaly has not been discussed, let alone acknowledged:
the reporting by the major US TV news networks in the first few
hours immediately after the attacks.
1. MSNBC presented an elaborately detailed story about the
lifestyle and anti-US philosophy of Osama bin Laden - while both
towers were still burning and long before Bin Laden had been accused
2. Fox News featured a "man in the street" eye
witness who explained in strangely formal language the science
behind why the towers collapsed when most engineers and firemen were
utterly baffled and in shock by what had just taken place.
CBS featured a Bush administration insider (and not identified as
such) as a guest who actively worked to dissuade Dan Rather (and
viewers) from speculating that there must have been explosive
charges placed in the buildings for them to have collapsed the way
How was it that these stories - based on no fact,
no research and no inquirry - appeared in full blown form so quickly
on US news networks and then became part of the core myths of what
happened on 9/11?
Were these stories prepared in
There's an old intelligence saying that "once is
happenstance, twice is coincidence, but three times is enemy
Because most of these clips ran only once and were
not repeated after they'd done their job, it made it difficult, if
not impossible, for viewers to analyze them critically.
thanks to the magic of video tape and a few people who immediately
started taping the news after the attacks, we have this important
evidence that at the very least these attacks appear to have been
anticipated and prepared for by forces that have the ability to
exert strong influence over the output of the newsrooms of major US
If you want an update on the status of
this video and where you can see it in the future, please add your
name to the Brasscheck TV subscribers list in the box below