T. E. Bearden – November 28, 2007
The Incident
An incident that occurred in the Charlotte Douglas International
Airport in North Carolina earlier this month is at least a curious
coincidence, or it may possibly even represent assassination and
suppression of another highly important “energy from the vacuum” (EFTV)
invention. At least such a possibility should be considered, and then
if
all
the facts warrant questioning the autopsy finding of death from natural
causes, the incident should be more deeply investigated.
The victim’s name was M. DeGeus. DeGeus was found slumped in his car in
the long term parking area of the airport, totally unresponsive. He was
rushed to the hospital, and was pronounced dead very quickly, according
to
www.WBTV.com
The resulting autopsy indicated heart failure, and thus concluded
“death from natural causes”. Hence police are not investigating it any
further, and they are not considering it as a possible homicide.
Some Background on the Victim and His Invention
DeGeus was in fact the inventor of a thin wafer-like material/device
that somehow specially aligned the atoms or electron currents ongoing
in that material, so that the wafer produced a constant amperage at a
small voltage – continuous real power, or in other words a strange kind
of “self-powering battery”. It is actually powered by the ongoing and
continuous tremendous exchange of energy by the active vacuum with the
charges of any material. This exchange is exceptionally powerful, and
normally our electromagnetic systems and devices only use just a tiny
bit of it.
But as is known in physics, even simple materials (such as a simple
short piece of ordinary copper wire) have extraordinary symmetrical
cross currents ongoing perpetually, even when no ordinary “net” current
is flowing since normally there is no asymmetry. E.g., quoting Swann:
"Think of the cables which carry the telephone current in the form
of electrons. In the absence of the current the electrons are moving in
all directions. As many are moving from left to right as are moving
from right to left; and the nothingness which is there is composed of
two equal and opposite halves, about a million million amperes per
square centimeter in one direction, and a million million amperes per
square centimeter in the other direction. The telephone current
constitutes an upsetting of the balance to the extent of one hundredth
of a millionth of an ampere per square centimeter, or about one part in
a hundred million million million. Then if this one part in a hundred
million million million is at fault by one part in a thousand, we ring
up the telephone company and complain that the quality of the speech is
faulty." [W.F.G. Swann, Physics Today, June. 1951, p. 9.]
However, if by special alignment of atoms and basic constituents one
does provide an EM asymmetry in this naturally occurring “opposing huge
EM power currents” always ongoing laterally in the matter itself, then
a net lateral direct current (real EM power) can be freely provided by
that altered material at a resulting voltage (indicating the asymmetry)
because every charge in the material is continually involved in an
enormous energy reaction with its local active vacuum.
This continual giant energy interaction of every charge with the
seething vacuum is already well-known in modern quantum field theory.
E.g., quoting Aitchison:
"...the concept of a 'single particle' actually breaks down in
relativistic quantum field theory with interactions, because the
interactions between 'the particle' and the vacuum fluctuations (or
virtual quanta) cannot be ignored." [I. J. R. Aitchison, "Nothing's
Plenty: The Vacuum in Modern Quantum Field Theory," Contemporary
Physics, 26(4), 1985, p. 357.].
A Little Corroborating Information
Indeed, I found an obscure bit of information that seems directly
related to proving the concept. We urge other investigators to further
investigate this effect. Quoting:
“…infrared Tourmaline is the only mineral to show permanent
electricity on the earth and is also a natural (non-manufactured)
source of negative ions and far infrared (FIR) rays.
Around 1986, it was found in a research station in Japan
that, even though tourmaline was broken down in smaller pieces, a
positive and a negative electrode existed on both ends of the crystal,
and the electrodes never disappeared unless tourmaline was boiled near
1000°C.
In addition, when the positive and the negative electrodes of a
tourmaline crystal were connected to each other, it was proven to show
low electricity of 0.06mA.”
We suspect that the vast new phenomena uncovered in nanocrystalline
research will also probably have similar “self-powering DC battery”
capabilities in some cases.
At any rate, altering the layering characteristics of the wafer
material used by DeGeus provides a broken symmetry in its usual
equal-and-opposite cross currents. This asymmetry results in the little
DeGeus solid state wafer pouring out a
net steady lateral DC current
at a given steady voltage. In short, it becomes a “perpetual battery”
type of device, gating and pouring out steady and directly usable net
DC power, and fed by energy from the seething vacuum reaction due to
that organized broken symmetry.
Proposed Explanation of the “Self-Powering Battery”
Physics already tells us that, when we have a broken symmetry, then
something previously virtual becomes observable. So when we have a
power supply using the normal proven asymmetry of opposite charges (its
dipolarity), it will be receiving input energy from the virtual state
vacuum, cohering it to quantum size, and emitting it as real,
observable EM energy. E.g., quoting Nobelist Lee:
“…the violation of symmetry arises whenever what was thought to be a non-observable turns out to be actually an observable.”
[T. D. Lee, Particle Physics and Introduction to Field Theory, Harwood
Academy Publishers, Chur, New York, and London, 1981, p. 181.]
DeGeus Wafers and the Purpose of his Planned Trip
DeGeus appears to have readily achieved different voltages and
currents (different levels of power) by grouping, multiple-layering,
etc. – much like connecting or grouping individual batteries. The
novelty was that the inventor had discovered how to build these wafers
extremely cheaply – couple bucks each for a small one, with an assembly
of them for greater power just requiring multiples of the basic cost.
He is believed to have been from a well-to-do European
family with significant assets in South America. His family is reported
to have claimed the body and officially tied up all his assets,
effects, records, etc. The legal ongoings are likely to permanently
suppress any and all technical lab notes, descriptions, etc.
Unknown to the authorities investigating his death, DeGeus
was on his way to Europe to receive very substantial funding to put his
invention into mass production and marketing.
Importance of the DeGeus Invention
As an example of the importance of this probably-now-lost “free energy
from the vacuum” invention, consider an electric car with a much
smaller DeGeus wafer assembly “battery pack” using self-powering
“batteries” taking all their energy output continually from the
seething vacuum. As can be seen, suddenly one has eliminated the
recharging of batteries for the electric car, and is now using a
“permanent, self-powering battery” instead. Thus one has achieved the
dream of a “self-powering electric auto”, taking all its input energy
cleanly from the active vacuum environment itself, without need of
burning physical fuel to run the car or recharge the battery. In short,
a car also without harmful emissions that damage and pollute the
biosphere and contribute to global warming.
Use of a larger DeGeus battery, together with an alternator,
would also produce a self-powering unit capable of powering the average
home with AC power. Many other applications are obvious, as is also the
tremendous impact of such a developed technology upon our present
consumption of hydrocarbon fuels, nuclear fuel rods, etc.
If Assassination, Explanation of How It Was Done
So a question arises as to whether this was just a simple
“accidental” heart attack, or whether it could have been a very
professional assassination to suppress the inventor and his invention.
While we cannot definitively answer that question, we can explain
exactly how such an assassination could have been done, which would
have given the victim a massive heart attack or stroke or both,
resulting in his death.
The standard method of assassination to provide a certified
autopsy report of “death by natural causes” is the little EM beam
“shooter” using the Venus ECCM technique – i.e., warping of its
wavefront – to destroy the body’s control of its heartbeat. There are
two basic sizes: One is about the size of a dime-store pocketbook, and
has an effective range of something like 30 feet or so. The other is
the size of a bazooka (shoulder-held rocket launcher) and its beam is
effective at a range of about 200 feet or so. It also is often used
with infrared sighting, to fire through a wall at a person (say, in a
room on the second floor) by aiming at his infrared change and
signature detected outside the building.
A person struck by this Venus-technique warped wavefront beam has a
sudden interruption of all control of his heartbeat, and so his heart
goes into instant, uncontrolled, and violent fibrillation. Exposure to
the main beam for 10 seconds or more is almost certain to result in
death of the individual, by a resulting massive heart failure, stroke,
or both.
My colleague Ken Moore and I were struck with just such a
beam from a small Venus beam shooter, in the inside breast coatpocket
of the assassin, in a restaurant here in Huntsville several years ago.
We both felt the beam and the instant fibrillation. I personally saw
the assassin, about 20 feet away from us and well-dressed in suit and
tie, pull back his coat front and point that book-sized shooter at us.
Fortunately we were seated right beside the emergency exit from the
dining room, and I knew about Venus technique shooters and their
drastic effects. So we just immediately jumped right through that exit,
setting off all the alarms, but getting out of the beam in just a few
seconds. So we lived to tell the tale.
If this were indeed used in the DeGeus death case, it would
have been very simple for the assassin to simply approach him while he
was still sitting in his just-parked car, hit him with the beam and
hold it on him for, say, 30 seconds to a minute, then close his coat
and simply walk away. And no one would have been the wiser, till the
victim was found by someone in his car, either dead or dying.
There is the information for the reader’s review. The reader
will have to make up his own mind as to what probably really happened,
and whether it was truly an act of nature (a normal heart attack) or a
deliberately induced heart failure (an assassination using the standard
Venus shooter).
Other Similar Incidents
There are of course other incidents similar to this. Stan Meyer, a
well-known inventor who apparently got his watergas working well,
rushed from a restaurant and shouted “They’re killing me!” (Some
reports stated he shouted “They’re poisoning me”), and then collapsed
and died. Simply Google on the web, for many articles on Stan Meyer,
his invention, the threats to his life, and his strange death.
An Australian researcher and friend of mine also had a colleague who
was assassinated in an upstairs room by a shot from the street below,
using the larger bazooka-sized Venus shooter. The other persons there
actually observed the assassin load the bazooka-shaped shooter back
into his vehicle and speed away.
In Conclusion
All we can state for certain is that (1) lots of inventors of
successful watergas, self-powering systems, etc. have been severely
warned or in some cases killed. (2) Many other “free energy from the
active medium” inventors have been threatened, bought out, or killed –
or experienced a mysterious death (we tell neophytes to be careful,
else one can have a “sudden suicide” on one’s way to the supermarket!)
(3) The Venus electronic countermeasures technique is well-known and
established. (4) I have personally experienced just such an
assassination attempt, with my good friend Lieutenant Colonel (retired)
Ken Moore with me and also experiencing the weapon effects and our very
rapid escape in the nick of time. So I have a corroborating witness.
Nonetheless, the interested reader will have to take it from
there and draw his or her own conclusions about the DeGeus incident.
Was it just a curious natural heart attack, or was it a deliberate
assassination?
Hopefully time will tell.
www.cheniere.org/toc.html
Last updated 06/12/2007
Homepage